Noruega - Ataque de falsa bandeira ?

[fornat]

Noruega - Ataque de falsa bandeira ?

Operação de bandeira falsa
Origem: Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre.

Operação de bandeira falsa (False flag em Inglês) são operações conduzidas por governos, corporações ou outras organizações que aparentam ser realizadas pelo inimigo de modo a tirar partido das consequências resultantes. O nome é retirado do conceito militar de utilizar bandeiras do inimigo. Operações de bandeira falsa foram já realizadas tanto em tempos de guerra como em tempo de paz.

Estamos perante mais uma operação dos serviços de inteligência ? Mossad parece ser uma hipótese a considerar ...

1- Tamanho das explosões e múltiplas bombas apontam para um trabalho profissional em grande escala (Mossad ?).

http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/

Norway was prepared to vote for Palestinian statehood in the UN General Assembly and this Mossad terrorist attack was symbolic. The negotiations that led to the international agreement on a future Palestinian state are known as the "Oslo Accords."
Anders Behring Breivik is suspect in massacre of over 80 at Labour Party Youth camp on Norwegian island and downtown Oslo bombing. Breivik is being called a Christian fundamentalist even though he was a Freemason and supporter of such vile Zionist Islamophobes as Pam Geller and Richard Pipes. Pipes and Geller are ciphers for Israeli intelligence and propaganda elements and provide a clear link between Breivik and Mossad, which is under orders to stage false flag attacks to garner support for Israel against Palestine, Cyprus and Norway being the two most recent examples of Mossad-staged attacks. And when it comes to "Al Qaeda's" Mossad seal of approval, the vicious Zionist Rupert Murdoch and his Zio-trash papers can always be relied on to help out. Murdoch's scandal-plagued "Sun" reports that Norwegian attacks are the work of "Al Qaeda":
   
WAYNE MADSEN REPORT
INTERNATIONAL NEWS:

   * The "Al Qaeda" seal of approval -- "Al Qaeda" never leaves home without it: Norway was prepared to vote for Palestinian statehood in the UN General Assembly and this Mossad terrorist attack was symbolic. The negotiations that led to the international agreement on a future Palestinian state are known as the "Oslo Accords."
   * Anders Behring Breivik is suspect in massacre of over 80 at Labour Party Youth camp on Norwegian island and downtown Oslo bombing. Breivik is being called a Christian fundamentalist even though he was a Freemason and supporter of such vile Zionist Islamophobes as Pam Geller and Richard Pipes. Pipes and Geller are ciphers for Israeli intelligence and propaganda elements and provide a clear link between Breivik and Mossad, which is under orders to stage false flag attacks to garner support for Israel against Palestine, Cyprus and Norway being the two most recent examples of Mossad-staged attacks. And when it comes to "Al Qaeda's" Mossad seal of approval, the vicious Zionist Rupert Murdoch and his Zio-trash papers can always be relied on to help out. Murdoch's scandal-plagued "Sun" reports that Norwegian attacks are the work of "Al Qaeda":

With death toll now over 90, Breivik not alone in attack. Police investigating second shooter. Obama administration covers up for Israel by calling attack "domestic." With ample evidence of Mossad involvement in Oslo, it is up to every one of us to report to the Nth degree any suspicious contacts with Israelis or Israeli sympathizers. Because our police forces in America, New Zealand, Norway, Britain, Sweden, Denmark, France, Canada, Australia and elsewhere are infiltrated with Mossad sayanim, katsas, and jumper katsas, we must take it upon ourselves to expose these agents, publicize their names, turn the disinfectant of sunshine on their subterranean operations, and generally, make life miserable for them. WMR editor is the godson of Norwegian god-parents from Trondheim and Israel and Mossad have now made their viciousness intensely personal. Tillid ingen israelske!

2- 48 horas antes do ataque  a polícia norueguesa fazia um simulacro de atentados bombistas http://mobil.aftenposten.no/article.htm?articleId=3569108

3- As relações entre Israel e a Noruega estão extremamente tensas

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/features/norway-examines-the-ethics-of-its-israel-investments-1.280875

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3984621,00.html

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/139870.html

http://www.truthwinds.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/israel/news.php?q=1311434819

4- Os jovens vitimados defendiam um boicote a produtos israelitas http://www.conelle.net/apps/blog/show/7804766-another-possible-motive-for-israel-terror-to-bomb-norway-norway-wanted-out-of-libya

5- Nos dias anteriores ao ataque o Departamento de Segurança interna DHS dos EUA coloca um vídeo mostrando sobretudo terroristas brancos de olhos azuis http://nation.foxnews.com/terrorism/2011/07/21/dhs-characterizes-terrorists-white-americans

http://www.infowars.com/evidence-shows-norway-terror-attack-a-false-flag/

Evidence Shows Norway Terror Attack a False Flag

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
July 23, 2011

Prior to the events in Norway, the Department of Homeland Security released a propaganda video characterizing white middle class Americans as terrorists and members of white al-Qaeda, a term designed to conflate the image of the CIA-created Islamic terror group and "rightwing extremists" in America.

The DHS video is part of the government's "See Something, Say Something" mass hysteria campaign and follows its report leaked to the media in 2009 designating libertarians and Second Amendment advocates as terrorists and right-wing extremists.

The alleged perpetrator in the Norway bombing and shooting is being described as a right-wing extremist who was a former member of a popular political party that regards itself to be a "libertarian people's party" with an ideology based on classical liberalism.

Anders Behring Breivik was at one time a member of the Progress Party, according to news reports. He was a member from 2004 to 2006 and in its youth party from 1997-2006 through 2007.

The Progress Party platform preamble identifies the organization as populist libertarian and its main declared goal as a reduction in taxes and government intervention. The CFR says the Progress Party and similar political parties in Sweden and Finland represent a European Tea Party movement on the rise. In the U.S., the Tea Party has opposed government bailouts to the banksters and has called for ending the Federal Reserve.

The EU, the IMF and the international bankers are worried about growing populism in Europe. "Rising political populism around Europe, driven by public anger over the impact of the financial crisis, threatens to make solving the euro zone's debt woes increasingly difficult," Reuters reported in April.

Millions of Europeans are opposed to raiding their treasuries to pay for debt contrived by the bankers and have turned in large numbers to political parties such as the True Finns.

The True Finns' main campaign plank is opposition to funding a bailout for Portugal. In April, the Finnish party emerged from relative obscurity and moved into the political limelight. Its sudden popularity took the European establishment by surprise.

The false flag attack in Norway arrives as populism grows in Germany, Europe's reluctant paymaster for the contrived debt-based economic crisis.

Establishment politicians in Germany have balked at a second bankster bailout. "We did it once, and we cannot do it a second time, we simply can't," said Jochen Sanio, head of the German financial market watchdog BaFin. Sanio said if the government raided the German treasury again the "taxpayers would come and hang all of us."

The EU and the European political establishment are beholden to the bankers and their "free market" – as in free to loot and plunder – neoliberal policies and have now pulled out all the stops in an effort to crush resistance to endless bailouts designed to crash local economies and destroy national sovereignty.

It is no mistake the corporate media is comparing Anders Behring Breivik to Timothy McVeigh. Hours after the terrorist attack, Norway's public broadcaster NRK cited Tore Bjørgo at the Police College in Oslo who said the attack resembled the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City. The 1995 attack blamed on Timothy McVeigh killed 168 people.

Bjørgo mentioned The Turner Diaries, the "anti-government" novel written by William Luther Pierce, the former leader of the white nationalist organization National Alliance. The novel was introduced as evidence during the trial of Timothy McVeigh, the government agent patsy set-up to take the fall for the bombing.

The Oklahoma City bombing was a false flag event used to roll out several draconian aspects of the police state in the 1990s. Following the attack, Congress passed at the behest of then president Clinton a number of national security proposals that built the foundation and established antecedents for the PATRIOT Act in response to the staged attacks of September 11, 2011.

In addition to establishing a basis for so-called anti-terror legislation, the Oklahoma City bombing was used to demonize the patriot movement that formed in response to the brazen government attack on the Branch Davidians at Waco on April 19, 1993.

False flag attacks followed by intense propaganda campaigns are one of several methods used by government to neutralize political opposition.

Breivik is obviously a patsy for a Gladio operation to destroy political opposition to the bankers. Operation Gladio was a "strategy of tension" devised by the elite that employed terrorism – assassination and bombings – to discredit political opponents in Europe. It was set-up by the CIA and staffed in part with former members of Mussolini's secret police.

In the days ahead, we can expect more false flag terror events. These will be used by the corporate media to portray opponents to the bankster scam as child killing terrorists. For the global elite, mass murder blamed on political opponents is a legitimate tool in the plan to take down national economies and install a one-world totalitarian government and banking system run in neofeudal fashion.

[jeso]

Vai-te catar.
Esta besta não tem ideologia nem propósito.

[fornat]

Muitos terroristas podem estar a ser "ajudados" e "orientados" pelos serviços de inteligência sem terem consciência disso ...

Os serviços de inteligência chamam-lhes "patsies".

[fornat]

1-Muitas testemunhas viram mais do que um atirador.

2-Este ataque estará relacionado com a decisão da Noruega de deixar de bombardear a Líbia? Envolvimento da NATO ?

http://www.infowars.com/norway-terror-attacks-a-false-flag/

Norway Terror Attacks a False Flag

Webster G. Tarpley
Infowars.com
July 24, 2011

More Than One Shooter on Island; Oslo Bomb Drill Just Concluded; Was It NATO's Revenge for Norway's Decision to Stop Bombing Libya?

The tragic terror attacks in Norway display a number of the telltale signs of a false flag provocation. It is reported that, although the world media are attempting to focus on Anders Behring Breivik as a lone assassin in the tradition of Lee Harvey Oswald, many eyewitnesses agree that a second shooter was active in the massacre at the Utøya summer youth camp outside of Oslo. It has also come to light that a special police unit had been conducting a drill or exercise in downtown Oslo which involved the detonation of bombs – exactly what caused the bloodshed a few hundred meters away little more than 48 hours later. Further research reveals that United States intelligence agencies had been conducting a large-scale program of recruiting retired Norwegian police officers with the alleged purpose of conducting surveillance inside the country. This program, known as SIMAS Surveillance Detection Units, provided a perfect vehicle for the penetration and subversion of the Norwegian police by NATO.

Media paints Breivik as lone wolf, Lee Harvey Oswald type terrorist.

A motive for the attack is also present: as part of its attempt to mount an independent foreign policy, including the imminent diplomatic recognition of a Palestinian state as part of a general rapprochement with the Arab world, Norway was leading the smaller NATO states in dropping out of the imperialist aggressor coalition currently bombing Libya. Norway was scheduled to stop all bombing and other sorties against the Gaddafi forces as out of August 1 at the latest.

Finally, the CIA limited hangout operation known as Wikileaks has already furnished a prefabricated off-the-shelf case for incompetence and malfeasance against the current Norwegian government that is doing all these things – in the form of a series of real or doctored dispatches which document the alleged negligence of this government in dealing with the terrorist threat, all in the view of US State Department officials.

VG of Oslo: "Several" Eyewitnesses Say there were Two Shooters on the Island

As noted, world press and media of the Anglo-American school have immediately battened onto Breivik as an archetypal lone assassin cast in the mold of Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, and so many others. The problem for the terror mythographs is that , in most of these cases, there is credible to overwhelming evidence that these figures could not have acted alone. Among more recent loan assassins, Breivik could be compared to Major Nidal Hasan of Fort Hood, Texas, whose shooting spree dates back to November 2009. Hasan is accused of having killed seven people. At the time, it was considered remarkable that Hasan had managed to kill so many armed soldiers on the military base. But early reports suggested that there were one or two other shooters in addition to Hasan. As usually happens, these extra shooters were soon expunged from the hegemonic media narrative.1

In the Norwegian case, the evidence that Breivik was not alone in claiming his fearful toll of victims is clear and convincing. Here are some excerpts from a report published by the Oslo newspaper VG:

   "Several of the youths who were at the Utøya the shooting drama, told VG that they are convinced that there must have been more than one perpetrator. Marius Helander Røset believes the same thing: – I am sure that there was shooting from two different places on the island at the same time, he said.

  Witnesses: – There were two people

   Police believe Anders Behring Breivik (32) is the perpetrator who was dressed as a policeman , and have charged him for two terrorist attacks. Young people interviewed by VG describe an additional perpetrator – who was not wearing a police uniform. The person was following them around was 180 centimeters tall, had thick dark hair and a Nordic appearance. He had a pistol in his right hand and a rifle on his back. – I believe that there were two people who were shooting, says Alexander Stavdal (23)....

   At the press conference Saturday morning opened the police said that there could have been several perpetrators and emphasized that there is an ongoing investigation."2

The presence of a second shooter is of course most inconvenient for the lone assassin theory, since it represents incontrovertible evidence of a criminal conspiracy, the very thing which the media coverage is usually anxious to avoid. In the Norwegian case, the reports of a second shooter seemed to be persistent enough 36 hours after the main event so as to hold out some hope that the entire official version can be brought down on this particular.

Police Had Drilled Setting off Bombs in Same Area a Few Days Earlier

Another telltale critical sign of a false flag operation is the holding of drills or exercises –allegedly for counterterrorism purposes — by the police or the military at the same time as the terror attack, or shortly before the real terror attack begins. Sometimes, the terror drills or exercises are scheduled to begin slightly after the time when the actual terror attack occurs. In these cases, it is often discovered that the self-styled anti-terror drill or exercise contains a simulated action or event which strongly resembles the real world terror attack, the one which actually kills people. The media will then refer to an astounding coincidence or a weird happenstance, but the reality is that the terror drill has been taken live or flipped live in the form of real killings. The secret is that the legally sanctioned drill has been used to conduit or bootleg the actual butchery through a government bureaucracy whose resources are required to run the terror but in which there are many officials who cannot be allowed to know what is happening.

Police conducted bomb drill.

The Norway events provide a very clear illustration of this principle. In Oslo, a powerful bomb went off in or near the building which houses the office of the Prime Minister. Exactly as we would expect, special anti-terror police had been drilling setting off bombs in a nearby part of the Norwegian capital little more than 48 hours earlier. The public had not been informed in advance, but found out what was happening when they began hearing bombs on Tuesday and Wednesday, whereas the main bomb went off on Friday. Here is a report from the newspaper Aftenposten:

"Armed police were seen in the area around the opera house in Oslo, and violent explosions could be heard over large parts of the city. No one knew that this was all a matter of practice. The Information Section of the Oslo police deeply regrets that the public was not made aware of the seemingly dramatic exercise....It was the emergency squad, the national police special unit against terrorism, which was conducting a drill in the cordoned off area at Bjørvika pier. According to a press release from the police, nearly a day after the exercise, the drill consisted of training in the controlled detonation of explosive charges....The exercise will continue for the rest of Wednesday night and a few more explosions are expected....The exercise followed a familiar pattern for all anti-terror forces around the world: The men lowered themselves down from the ceiling and into through the window that had just been blown out, while they fired hand their weapons."3

Peter Power of Visor Consultants told BBC Radio Five in the wake of the London subway bombings of July 7, 2005 that his firm had been conducting an exercise based on explosions going off in substantially the same stations of the London underground at the same times when the real explosions had actually occurred. The Norwegian events exhibit the same kind of strange coincidence.

A Motive: Norway Had Decided to Stop Bombing Libya August 1

The targets of the Norwegian terror attacks are all expressly political, including government offices and a summer youth camp of the ruling Labor Party, and thus point in the direction of politics. The government of Norway is currently a coalition composed of the Labor Party, the Socialist Left Party, and the Center Party. Norway has traditionally attempted to cultivate a pro-Arab foreign policy, as seen in its sponsorship of the Oslo peace accords between Israeli Prime Minister Rabin and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat in the mid-1990s. The current government has announced its intention of granting diplomatic recognition to a Palestinian state in the near future. When the destabilization of Libya began last February, the Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre of the Labor Party warned Norway's partners in the NATO alliance against getting involved.

But soon after this, Norway gave in to US pressure and agreed to participate in NATO's bombing of Libya for an initial period of three months, sending six planes which have carried out an estimated 10% of all the bombing raids mounted by the Atlantic alliance. However, as the end of its three-month commitment had passed, Norway had reduced its contingent to four planes during the month of July, and had announced on June 10 that it was planning to withdraw altogether from the NATO bombing coalition no later than August 1.

The Norwegian decision to drop out of the NATO attack coalition was associated with a similar move by the Netherlands, which was announced on that same day of June 10. The Dutch had decided to maintain their contingent of six planes, but will no longer take part in bombing attacks on ground targets. Henceforth, the Dutch are willing only to help enforce the no-fly zone through air interdiction. There was therefore the potential that Norway's example could trigger a general tendency by the smaller NATO states to quit the bombing coalition, in which their collective presence is highly significant.

Leading figures of the Norwegian government were among the first to undercut the supposed rationale for the NATO bombing, while urging negotiations: '"The solution to the problems in Libya are political, they cannot be solved by military means alone," Norwegian Prime Minister Stoltenberg told reporters gathered for a conference in Oslo on May 13. "We are very much supporting all efforts to find a political solution to the challenges we are facing in Libya," he added. Norway's government ...pledged to scale down its role in NATO-orchestrated air strikes on Libya after its current three-month commitment ends on June 24.4

This was the policy of the entire Norwegian government: 'Norway will scale down its fighter jet contribution in Libya from six to four planes and withdraw completely from the NATO-led operation by Aug. 1, the government said Friday.... Defense Minister Grete Faremo said she expects understanding from NATO allies because Norway has a small air force and cannot "maintain a large fighter jet contribution during a long time." Norway's air force, meanwhile says its F-16 jets have carried out about 10 percent of the NATO airstrikes in Libya since March 31. The parties in Norway's center-left coalition government had been at odds over whether to extend the country's participation, which was scheduled to expire June 24. The most leftist faction in the government, the Socialist Left Party, opposed an extension, but a compromise was reached to stay in the operation until Aug. 1 with fewer planes. "It is wise to end the Norwegian fighter jet contribution. Now Norway should apply its efforts to find a peaceful solution in Libya," Socialist Left Party lawmaker Baard Vegar Solhjell said.'5

State Department Complained of Norway's "Lack of Commitment" to Libyan Adventure

The Norwegian decision to stop waging war against Libya, the first of its kind by any member of the Atlantic alliance, has attracted the attention of diplomatic observers, one of whom commented that the current government in Oslo has advocated "a distinctly more peaceful approach to global policies by the Norwegian government.... [despite] recent pressure from the US on Norway to contribute more in Libya military campaign. Norway has been resisting that pressure and pushing for a more peaceful approach to the US-led NATO attacks on Libya and refused to provide weapons to NATO, finally announcing last month that Norway would quit its military role in Libya by August 1. In March, as the US was rallying unilateral support to invade Libya, Norway's minister of foreign affairs Jonas Gahr Støre was one of the few nations to warn the US against armed intervention in Libya. Norway initially supplied six fighter jets for Libya operations and has carried out about 10% of the Libya strikes since 19 March. However, US officials singled out Norway and Denmark for their 'lack of commitment' to the mission to oust Gaddafi... Other Norway-Libya links include Norway's major oil- and fertilizer-related interests in Libya: the Norwegian state-owned Statoil, which has about 30 employees at its Tripoli offices....[Norway's] businesses have conducted major business operations in Libya, in co-operation with Qaddafi's regime."6

At the present stage of the inquiry, the best estimate of a motive for the Norwegian attacks is to punish the country for its independent and pro-Arab foreign policy in general, and for its repudiation of the NATO bombing coalition arrayed against Libya in particular.

Are SIMAS Surveillance Detection Units the New Gladio for Norway?

US and NATO intelligence have been shown to possess extraordinary capabilities inside Norway, many of which may be operating outside of the control of the Norwegian government. In early November 2010, the Oslo television channel TV2 exposed the existence of an extensive network of paid assets and informants of US intelligence recruited from the ranks of retired police and other officials. The ostensible goal of this program was the surveillance of Norwegians who were taking part in demonstrations and other activities critical of the United States and its policies. One of the Norwegians recruited was the former chief of the anti-terror section of the Oslo police.7 Although the goal was supposedly merely surveillance, it is possible to imagine some other and far more sinister activities that could be carried out by such a network of retired cops, including the identification and subversion of rotten apples on the active-duty police force. Some of the capabilities of a network of this type would not be totally alien to the sort of events that have just occurred in Norway.

The official name for the type of espionage cell which the United States was creating in Norway is Surveillance Detection Unit (SDU). The SDUs in turn operate within the framework of the Security Incident Management Analysis System (SIMAS). SIMAS is known to be used for spying and surveillance by US Embassies not just in the Nordic bloc of Norway, Denmark, and Sweden, but worldwide. The terror events also raise the question of whether SIMAS has an operational dimension. Could this apparatus represents a modern version of the Cold War stay behind networks set up in all NATO countries and best-known under the name of the Italian branch, Gladio?

The Norwegian government needs to find out. Thus far Norwegian ministers have asserted that they never approved the SIMAS network of SDUs. "We never knew about it," claimed Norway's Justice Minister Knut Storberget and Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre in chorus. Hillary Clinton stated instead that the Norwegians had been informed.

CIA's Wikileaks Limited Hangout Has Rationale for Toppling Norway's Government

Thanks to document dumps by the CIA limited hangout subsidiary generally known as Wikileaks, an obvious path for using the Norwegian terror attacks as a rationale for overthrowing the current government has already been provided. Real or doctored State Department cables obligingly made available by Wikileaks portray the Norwegian government which NATO hates as a collection of bunglers and misfits, unable to take effective measures to safeguard the national security of the country.

Some of these tables have been published in the immediate wake of the terror attacks by the London Daily Telegraph, a newspaper reputedly close to NATO intelligence circles. According to this article, while 'talking about an attempt by the Police Security Service (PST) to track one particular suspected Al Qaeda terror cell, a cable written by the US Ambassador to Norway, Barry White, describes [how Norwegian authorities] ... refused the help of the UK authorities to put surveillance on a potential suspect and adds: "Not only will they not put their own resources on him...but they also just turned down the visiting UK intel service's offer of two twelve-person surveillance teams." The cable goes on to say the UK and US intelligence services analyzed coded conversation between terror suspects and decided it warranted surveillance. But, says the cable, "PST instead found a way to interpret the same translated coded conversation in a rosier, less threatening light, an interpretation which makes little sense to the US or UK."' A catalog of even the most recent failures and fiascos of the FBI and the CIA in the so-called Global War on Terror would help to put these hypocritical judgments into proper perspective, but it would also be too voluminous to be appended here.

Another damaging particular appears made to order for an attempt to blame the alleged bungling of the Norwegian government for the Oslo bomb attack: 'The memo also reveals how, despite apparently having surveillance on the suspect, the PST lost track of bomb-making equipment which was being stored in an apartment after it was apparently removed without investigators' noticing. The PST then failed to track one suspect for 14 days because the investigator assigned to him was called away on another job. The memo concludes: "The PST is in over its head...it simply cannot keep up."'

Another State Department memo dished up by Wikileaks, supposedly written in 2007... adds: "The official police (PST) threat evaluation...states that international terror organizations are not a direct threat against Norway. A memo written in 2008 shows how the US felt that Norway was not awake to the possibility of a potential terrorist attack. The cable reads: "We repeatedly press Norwegian authorities to take terrorism seriously. We will seek to build on this momentum to fight the still-prevalent feeling that terrorism happens elsewhere, not in peaceful Norway." And a cable written just last year adds: "The PST still viewed Denmark as more of a target than Norway, for reasons very specific to the cartoon controversy." 8

The government of Norway needs to go on the offensive and establish the whole truth of what has just occurred. Otherwise, that government is likely to succumb to the internationally orchestrated campaign which the Wikileaks documents so clearly foreshadow.

This post first appeared on Webster Trapley's blog.

References
1 http://tarpley.net/2009/11/16/nidal-malik-hasan-of-virginia-tech-bethesda-ond-fort-hood-a-major-patsy-in-a-drill-gone-live
2 See RIA Novosti, July 23, 2011, http://en.rian.ru/world/20110723/165350450.html; – From the VG website: "Flere av ungdommene som var på Utøya under skytedramaet forteller til VG at de er overbevist om at det må ha vært mer enn én gjerningsmann. Det mener også Marius Helander Røset." "Jeg har overbevist om at det var to personer som skjøt, sier Aleksander Stavdal (23)." "Vedkommende var i følge dem rundt 180 centimeter høy, hadde tykt mørkt hår og så nordisk ut. Han hadde en pistol i høyrehånden og et gevær på ryggen." http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/oslobomben/artikkel.php?artid=10080627
3 "Politiet glemte å informere om øvelse: Anti-terrorpolitiet avfyrte sprengladninger under en øvelse midt i Oslo, to hundre meter fra Operaen, men glemte å gi beskjed til publikum," Aftenposten, c. July 20, 2011, http://mobil.aftenposten.no/article.htm?articleId=3569108
4 "Libya solution more political than military-Norway," Reuters, 13 May 2011, http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/libya-solution-more-political-than-military-norway/
5 "Norway to quit Libya operation by August," AP, June 10, 2011, http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2011/jun/10/norway-to-quit-libya-operation-by-august/
6 Tragic Irony Surrounds Oslo Bombing, Phuket Word, July 23, 2011, http://www.phuketword.com/tragic-irony-surrounds-oslo-bombings
7 Thomas Borchert, "US-Geheimdienst mit Nordfiliale: USA lassen Norweger überwachen," Deutsche Presse-Agentur, November 4, 2010.
8 Mark Hughes, "WikiLeaks files show Norway unprepared for terror attack: Norway's intelligence service had previously been criticized for its failure to keep track of suspected terror cells and the country was felt to be complacent about the prospect of a terror attack, secret cables from the WikiLeaks files reveal," London Daily Telegraph, July 22, 2011. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/8655964/WikiLeaks-files-show-Norway-unprepared-for-terror-attack.html
Who is Norway shooting suspect Anders Behring Breivik?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6zOmX89IzU&feature=player_embedded

Norway Terror Attack was a False Flag Operation

Oslo Police Conducted Bombing Exercise Days Before Terrorist Blast....

In yet another example of how almost every major terror event is accompanied by a security drill focused around the same scenario, Oslo police were conducting a bombing exercise at a location near the Oslo Opera House just 48 hours before a terrorist blast hit a government building in the Norwegian capital.

According to the translated version of an Aftenposten report, "Anti-terror police fired explosive charges at a training center in Oslo, two hundred meters from the Opera, but forgot to notify the public."

The exercise occurred on Wednesday and revolved around anti-terror units attacking a disused building at the edge of Bjørvika pier with bombs and firearms.

"The men lowered themselves down from the roof and in through the window that had just been blown out, while they fired hand their weapons," states the report, noting that the exercise was "dramatic," produced "violent bangs," and was watched by spectators at the nearby Opera House.

A video of the drill that accompanies the story shows police scaling the side of a building with an explosion going off below them before they enter the window and start firing.

Police had to publicly apologize today for not informing the public about the exercise.

Although it's too early to judge the nature of this exercise, the fallback of a drill, which gives the state an excuse should any evidence of complicity in the real attack emerge, has been evident in previous major terror events, including both 7/7 and 9/11.

In the case of the London bombings, a consultancy agency with government and police connections was running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the London Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as happened in real life on the morning of July 7th, a "coincidence" many skeptics of the official story have dismissed as a statistical impossibility. Paul Joseph Watson, Prison Planet.com July 22, 2011

Article Source: http://www.infowars.com/oslo-police-conducted-bombing-exercise-days-before-te...

Wikipedia appears to confirm report of multiple shooters on Norway island. http://truthiscontagious.com/2011/07/24/wikipedia-appears-to-confirm-report-o...

Oslo Terror: Whose Agenda Does It Serve?: http://www.infowars.com/oslo-terror-whose-agenda-does-it-serve/

More-30-dead-terrorist-opens-Norwegian-summer-camp-car-bomb-devastates-Oslo. : http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2017709/MASSACRE-AT-KIDS-CAMP-More-30...

Arrested 32-year-old called himself nationalist: http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8...

'Caution! Watch out for false flags' - Lendman on Oslo attacks : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyi7_pKEXV8&feature=channel_video_title

http://www.infowars.com/norway-killer-anders-breivik-big-ego-religious-possibly-brainwashed/


Norway Killer Anders Breivik - big ego, religious, possibly brainwashed [RT.COM]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPQTvQwhwWQ&feature=player_embedded

[fornat]

http://octopedia.blogspot.com/

Segunda-feira, 25 de Julho de 2011

Oslo e coincidências

Ainda pouco sabemos acerca do atentado de Oslo.

Uma afirmação esquisita: afinal conhecemos o número dos mortos (92 vitimas), as modalidades e temos até quem já confessou o crime (o simpático Anders Behrin Breivik).
O que falta? O móbil? Não, temos o movente: temos um móbil de 1.500 páginas, escrito pelo mesmo Anders.

2083 Declaração de Independência Europa

Neste memorial, Anders explica que está a preparar o atentado desde o Outono de 2009.
Pormenorizado, nele invoca o uso do terrorismo como forma de "acordar" as massas e avança que será lembrado como o pior monstro desde a Segunda Guerra Mundial.

Não falta nada: símbolos celtas, traços dos Templários, a pesquisa do Sagrado Cálice, a cruz de Jerusalém.

Como se isso não fosse suficiente, Anders deixa fotografar-se com o traje maçónico (difícil imaginar um chamariz melhor: milhares de sites e blogues têm agora material para os próximos meses), declara ser profundamente cristão, anti-muçulmano, ex membro dum partido de Direita.

Por isso comprou seis toneladas de fertilizante, para confecionar as bombas.

Tudo certo, tudo resolvido então?

Não.

Em primeiro lugar: Anders não agiu sozinho: quem sobreviveu aos ataques afirma que os disparos foram efectuados por mais do que uma pessoa.

Mas este é o ponto mais importante: o que deve ser realçado é que mudam as cores, mudam as ideias, mas os métodos, após 10 anos, continuam a ser os mesmos: um louco, mais provavelmente alguns loucos, que com bombas e armas semeiam morte entre inocentes cidadãos, com motivações religiosas.

Que depois estas "motivações" não tenham fundamentos, e que tanto o alegado terrorismo muçulmano quanto o cristão estejam contra os princípios das respetivas religiões, isso não interessa: o que conta é rotular.

O mero acaso

Há uma série de factores adicionais que vale a pena lembrar:

A Noruega é um dos Países (primeiro na Europa) que anunciou o voto favorável à criação de um Estado Palestiniano na votação na ONU. Mas isto é uma coincidência.

A Noruega anunciou a retirada das suas tropas da Líbia. Também isto é uma coincidência.

A Noruega, por questões éticas, no ano passado impediu que duas empresas israelitas participassem na exploração dos seus poços de petróleo no Mar do Norte. Isto parece mesmo uma coincidência.

A Noruega alcançou nos últimos anos importantes acordos comerciais com a Rússia no âmbito da exploração do gás e do petróleo no Ártico e no Iraque (13 mil milhões de barris), ultrapassando as ofertas das empresas americanas. Olha: uma coincidência!

O Sosialistisk Venstreparti (Partido Socialista de Esquerda), que faz parte da coligação de governo, apresentou uma proposta na qual é pedida uma acção militar contra Israel caso este decida intervir militarmente contra Hamas em Gaza. Como se chama isto?...Talvez "coincidência".

Jonas Gahr Støre, Ministro dos Negócios Estrangeiros, ao longo da semana passada visitou um campo de Verão da juventude trabalhista e pediu que o muro de Jerusalém fosse derrubado. O campo era o da ilha de Utoya. Isto só pode ser uma coincidência.

Apenas indícios, não provas, que mostram que a primeira vitima da "vaga fundamentalista cristã" foi um dos Países europeus mais críticos a Israel e um dos que mais olham para Leste (a Rússia) nas questões económicas. E não pensem mal, pois isto não passa duma coincidência.

O modus operandi

Em primeiro lugar temos a versão dos media: Anders teria feito explodir uns prédios em Oslo (um dos quais o escritório do Primeiro Ministro), depois teria alcançado a ilha de Utoya para acabar com uma carnificina, sozinho e sem encontrar resistência.

Com o risco de matar os dois filhos do Primeiro Ministro, presentes na ilha, por uma terrível coincidência..

Depois, e mais uma vez, eis o factor "coincidência": um atentado e uma excitação. 48 horas antes, núcleos antiterroristas da polícia atacavam um prédio no centro da cidade, perto do Teatro da Opera, com bombas e armas. Mas esta é, evidentemente, uma coincidência.

Nazismo? Chamem Washington!

Para acabar, temos o culpado.
Como foi dito, é um homem de 32 anos e que estreia um novo terrorismo, o terrorismo cristão de extrema Direita.

Bin Laden morreu? Foi uma vitória dos Estados Unidos que assim conseguiram debelar uma das raízes do mal. Por isso já não há atentado islâmicos.

Mas não há tempo para descansar: desaparecida uma ameaça, eis que surge um novo monstro.

Desta vez não tem os traços orientais, este é um monstro que vive entre nós, e por isso até é mais perigoso. Em comum tem os métodos (as bombas, as armas) e a religião (cuidado, cuidado com a religião!), mas o resto é um produto 100% ocidental: neo-nazismo.

E onde há neo-nazismo há anti-semitismo.

Sem dúvida: é caso para pedir ajuda aos Estados Unidos, outra vez.

Neste artigo relatado no blog de Gilson Sampaio poderão encontrar mais informações acerca do binómio Noruega-Israel.

No resto do Mundo, entretanto...

Isso na Europa.

Nos Estados Unidos, entretanto, pelo menos cinco pessoas morreram e quatro ficaram feridas no Texas, num ataque realizado por um homem numa festa de aniversário que decorria numa pista de gelo. O ataque ocorreu ontem e o atirador acabou por suicidar-se.
Razão? Uma disputa familiar.

E no Yemen, um bombista suicida atacou um campo militar na cidade de Áden, no Sul do País, detonando explosivos numa carrinha quando duas viaturas militares saíam do local. Morreram sete pessoas e 18 ficaram feridas.

Mas estes são Muçulmanos, gente violenta, portanto não interessa.

Excelente artigo publicado por: informacaoincorrecta.blogspot.com

http://informacaoincorrecta.blogspot.com/2011/07/oslo-e-coincidencias.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+InformaoIncorrecta+%28Informa%C3%A7%C3%A3o+Incorrecta%29

Fontes: Corriere della Sera, Público, Expresso, Attilio Folliero, Blogghete

[fornat]

Mais um ataque com a cumplicidade dos serviços secretos israelitas, Mossad ?

A arma mais secreta e mais testada de Israel são os ataques de "falsa-bandeira".

"Israel's most secret and tried-and-true weapon is the "false flag" terrorist attack."

Breivik era um fervoroso pró-israelita e colocou vários comentários anti-muçulmanos e pró-israelitas no site www.document.no, que é operado por uma jornalista norueguesa pró-israelita.

"Breivik posted a number of his anti-Muslim and pro-Zionist screeds on the Norwegian website www.document.no, which is operated by Hans-Kristian Rustad, a Norwegian pro-Israeli journalist."

http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2011/07/25/after-oslo-time-to-crack-down-on-mossad-terrorism.html

After Oslo: Time to Crack Down On Mossad Terrorism

Wayne MADSEN (USA) | 25.07.2011 | 09:05

Wayne MADSEN (USA) é um dos mais reputados jornalistas de investigação do mundo. Com um extenso currículo no mundo dos serviços de inteligência . Foi convidado para testemunhar perante a US House of Representatives, o Criminal Tribunal da ONU para o Ruanda, e um painel de investigação do terrorismo do Governo francês. É convidado frequente da Fox News e também teve participações na ABC,NBC,CBS,CNN,BBC,etc.

BIO:

Investigative journalist, author and syndicated columnist. Has some twenty years experience in security issues. As a U.S. Naval Officer, he managed one of the first computer security programs for the U.S. Navy. He has been a frequent political and national security commentator on Fox News and has also appeared on ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, CNN, BBC, Al Jazeera, and MS-NBC. He has been invited to testify as a witness before the US House of Representatives, the UN Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and an terrorism investigation panel of the French government. A member of the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) and the National Press Club. Lives in Washington, D.C.


Artigo:

Israel's most secret and tried-and-true weapon is the "false flag" terrorist attack.

State-sponsored terrorism is defined by Encyclopedia Britannica as the "systematic use of violence to create a general climate of fear in a population and thereby to bring about a particular political objective [and] is employed by governments -- or more often by factions within governments -- against that government's citizens, against factions within the government, or against foreign governments or groups."

On July 22, a bomb, said to be an Oklahoma City-type explosive device, crafted with fertilizer and diesel fuel, blew up in downtown Oslo, Norway, in the heart of the government district. Shortly thereafter, a man dressed in a Norwegian police uniform opened fire on a Labor Party youth camp on the island of Utoya in Tyri fjord. Access to the island was by boat only.  Over 100 people were killed in the twin terror attacks.

Almost immediately, the world's corporate media began pushing the story that those who were responsible for the blast and mass shooting were associated with "Al Qaeda" and other radical Islamist groups. CNN's Washington, DC chief anchor Wolf Blitzer, a former spokesman for the powerful American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) lobby and a correspondent for the Jerusalem Post, began his late afternoon program by pointing to "Al Qaeda" and radical Islamists as the chief culprits for the terrorist attacks in Norway.

CNN paraded out a number "experts," in actuality, propagandists for the Israeli agenda linked to neo-conservative outlets and the Pentagon's "terrorism industrial complex," before the cameras to advance the radical Islamist meme even as Norwegian authorities pinned blame on the attack on at least one perpetrator, a Norwegian named Anders Behring Breivik. CNN constantly showed footage of frightened people in downtown Oslo running for their lives from the site of the blast, as well as still photograph of a pall of light-brown smoke over downtown Oslo. Of course, CNN's intention was to evoke memories of the 9/11 attack in Manhattan.

Breivik, who sometimes anglicized his name as Andrew Berwick in his numerous web postings, was said to be a right-wing Islamophobe who sympathized with Zionism and who was a Freemason... Breivik was also reported to be a fundamentalist Christian but he adopted a stance against the Lutheran Church, the state church of Norway, and argued for a "collective" counter-reformation to return the Protestant churches to the control of the Vatican and the Pope. Breivik lambasted the Lutheran Church and other mainstream Protestant churches, condemning "Priests in jeans who march for Palestine."

More incredibly, the London tabloid of Rupert Murdoch's scandal-plagued News International, The Sun, went to press with the following false headline: "Norway's 911: 'Al Qaeda' Massacre." On March 29, 2011, Harvard Law School's extremist Zionist Professor Alan Dershowitz penned a piece in the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal, a newspaper that actively discriminates against the hiring of non-Jews as reporters and editors in violation of U.S. civil rights and equal opportunity employment laws, in which he called Norway anti-Semitic. Dershowitz cited as an example former Norwegian Prime Minister Kare Willock's criticism of President Barack Obama's choice of Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff because he is Jewish. In fact, Emanuel's pro- Israeli sympathies as a former member of the Israel Defense Force are what prompted many political observers in Washington and elsewhere to question his primary loyalty to the United States.

A network of Israeli bloggers pushed a claim of responsibility on a previously-unknown group called Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami (the Helpers of the Global Jihad). The group's claims were picked up and run by several corporate media outlets and then pulled when it was discovered the claim was a hoax. Mossad has a program to distribute bogus claims of responsibility for Islamist terrorist attacks via "Jihadist" websites that are actually operated by the Mossad and a network of "hasbaratchiks," Israeli and foreign Jews who act as propagandists on the web. These hasbara (propaganda) agents and volunteers operate through such programs as Megaphone and GIYUS ("Give Israel Your United Support.") After the attempt to blame the Norway attacks on Islamists failed, the "hasbaratchiks" shifted to "sock puppet" troll mode, posting comments on blogs that criticized allegations that Mossad and Zionists were behind the Norway attacks, emphasizing that such beliefs were "anti-Semitic" and wild "conspiracy theories." Some Israeli "sock puppets" even offered lunatic suggestions that Breivik was planted by Islamists to make Israel and Zionists look bad.

When the "Islamist" connection to the holocaust in Norway was shown to be non-existent after Norwegian security and police agencies began looking at the evidence, the corporate media switched its propaganda line from "radical Islam" being responsible to "far –right extremism" opposed to multiculturalism and immigration in Europe as the culprit. Even outlets that in the past had been known for their independence from the corporate media line, including Al Jazeera and RT [formerly known as Russia Today], echoed the line that Breivik primarily represented right-wing opposition to Muslim immigrants in Europe. Al Jazeera repeated the line that Breivik was a "lone madman," the insinuation being that he was not linked to any wider network. While Breivik certainly was associated with the far-right xenophobic elements in Norway, Europe, and North America, there was no mention by the corporate media of his admiration for such American Zionist Islamophobes as Richard Pipes and Pam Geller. Geller led the bigoted anti-Muslim campaign against an Islamic Center near the site of "Ground Zero," the former World Trade Center site, in lower Manhattan. Breivik posted a number of his anti-Muslim and pro-Zionist screeds on the Norwegian website www.document.no, which is operated by Hans-Kristian Rustad, a Norwegian pro-Israeli journalist.

No corporate media outlets reported that the brand of far-right extremism of Breivik is closely associated with Zionist-supported far-right anti-immigrant political parties and movements in Western Europe, including the mis-named Progress Party of Norway, the Dutch Freedom Party of Islamophobe Geert Wilders, the Sweden Democrats, Finland's True Finns Party, the Danish People's Party, the English Defense League, the Pro-Germany Citizen's Movement, and a pan-Nordic fascist terrorist group called "Nordiske." Breivik also expressed support for the Tea Party in the United States...

The European anti-Muslim xenophobic network is linked to the notorious publication of Prophet Muhammad cartoons by the neo-conservative Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten and Norway's Dagbladet. The Euro-xenophobes are supported by the longtime Zionist Bernard-Henri Levy, the French philosopher who is a friend of French President Nicolas Sarkozy, and disgraced former International Monetary Fund managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn. It is noteworthy that Levy is one of the major backers of the Libyan rebels fighting Muammar Qaddafi. Norway announced it was pulling its aircraft from the NATO campaign in Libya at the end of July. Norway also announced its support for Palestine's sovereignty resolution in the UN General Assembly in September.

As more and more evidence pointed to Oslo being yet another example of a state-sponsored terrorist attack by Israel's Mossad, the corporate media studiously avoided mentioning how the Norwegian government through its recent actions, had become a major problem for Israel and its allies abroad, especially on the Palestine sovereignty issue... In addition, Norwegian police and intelligence are painfully aware of Mossad's past operations in Norway, including the infamous Lillehammer Affair in 1973. On July 21, 1973, Mossad agents assassinated Ali Hassan Salameh, a Moroccan waiter in Lillehammer, wrongly believing he was the operations chief for the Palestinian terrorist group "Black September." Norwegian police arrested the Mossad agents who killed Salameh and uncovered an intricate network of Mossad safe houses, phone numbers, and Norwegian sleeper agents for Mossad.

Just as was the case with the coordinated bombings of Madrid trains on March 22, 2004 and London buses and trains on July 7, 2005, viewed by European security services as being the work of not "Al Qaeda" but domestic "radicals," there was no link to Islamist radicals with the attacks in Norway. However, there was every indication that the attack on Norway was intended to shake up the Norwegian population and damage the reputation of the left-of-center Norwegian government of Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg.

The corporate media insisted that Breivik was solely responsible for Norway's worst violent attack since World War II. Norwegian police reports that a second gunman, described as having "thick dark hair and a non-Nordic appearance," were suppressed in much of the corporate media. The time line of the Oslo attack causes anyone's imagination to be stretched on being sold a "lone gunman/bomber" theory.

At 3:26 pm Oslo time a massive car bomb was detonated outside the office of the Prime Minister of Norway. Since July 22 was a public holiday, there were relatively few people inside the Prime Minister's office or the surrounding offices of the Petroleum and Energy Ministry and the VG [Verdens Gang] newspaper, Norway's largest paper.

As police responded to the downtown Oslo blast, Breivik was said to have taken a boat the Utoya island dressed as a policeman and began opening fire on young members of the Norwegian Labor Party youth camp meeting. The shooting allegedly began at 4:50 pm. Norwegian SWAT team "Delta" had trouble getting a helicopter started and struggled to find a boat to get to Utoya island. The SWAT team finally arrived on the island at 6:20 pm only to find scores of the next generation of Norwegian Labor Party leaders dead. Breivik calmly surrendered to the police. When Breivik arrived on Utoya he told police on the island that he was there for a routine security check following the bombing in downtown Oslo.

Norway's Acting Police chief Sveinung Sponheim said the police were still investigating whether Breivik was acting with a larger network. Sponheim's revelation countered the "lone wolf" theory advanced by corporate media outlets in Western nations.

Norway's coalition Labor-Socialist Left government has been seen as hostile to the interests of Israel and the United States. There is now a widespread belief that the terrorist attack against Norway was engineered to shock erstwhile peaceful Norway, a nation where police generally still patrol the streets unarmed, into adopting the police state tactics of the United States, Israel, Britain, and other Western nations. Norway's pro-Palestinian foreign policy also irked the Zionist and the far-right anti-Islamic factions in Europe and North America, as well as the governments of Israel and the United States.

In a move that complements American and Israeli propaganda that Norway has not stepped up to the surveillance state model imposed by other Western governments, the suspicious WikiLeaks decided to release U.S. State Department cables from the U.S. embassy in Oslo that criticized Norway for not recognizing the "Al Qaeda" threat and maintaining an insufficient security apparatus to combat Islamist terrorism and Pakistani immigrants.

The Barack Obama-appointed U.S. ambassador in Oslo, Barry White, who is Jewish and received a 2005 award from the pro-Israel American Jewish Committee, complained that the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) rejected two twelve-person British MI-6 intelligence surveillance teams to monitor an "Al Qaeda" cell in Norway.  Last November, the Norwegian government was shocked to learn that the U.S. embassy was operating a Surveillance Detection Unit in Oslo that was monitoring Norwegian citizens. Norwegian Justice Minister Knut Storberget said he was not informed of the presence of the U.S. spy unit in Oslo, which employed retired Norwegian police and intelligence officials. The Norwegian Data Protection Commissioner, Bjorn Erik Thon, said he had never seen such an intelligence operation in Norway. White complained that Norwegian security officials were apathetic and incompetent in dealing with the Islamist "terrorist threat." The failure of the Norwegian SWAT team to quickly respond to the massacre on Utoya may indicate that Norway's law enforcement and security networks and command-and-control systems had been interfered with by infiltrators with knowledge of the Norwegian systems. Those retired police and intelligence officials working for the U.S. embassy's surveillance unit are likely suspects in sabotaging the Norwegian police reaction capabilities on 7/22. Just 48 hours before the bombing in Oslo, police units were engaged in a terrorist bombing exercise at the Oslo Opera House, near what would later be "ground zero." In addition, in the days before the terrorist bombing, there was suspicious sewer work being conducted in the area near the Prime Minister's office.

In March, the leader of the Socialist Left, Kristen Halvorsen, the Minister of Education of Norway and a former Finance Minister, called for military action against Israel if it attacked Gaza. The Socialist Left and Labor Party, along with the Norwegian Peace Association and the Norwegian energy and telecommunications union, strongly support the Boycott Israel campaign, which includes backing the pan-European Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) committee and an embargo on arms sales to the Jewish state.  In August 2010, the Norwegian pension fund divested in two Israeli companies controlled by Israeli billionaire Lev Leviev, Africa Israel Investments and its subsidiary Danya Cebus.

Halvorsen had recently met with a delegation of American Jews who complained about Norway's "anti-Semitism," the tired and worn-out canard used by Zionists in confronting anti-Israeli sentiment around the world. In January, Halvorsen and her husband, Christo Halvorsen, a producer for the Norsk Rikskringkasting (NRK) television and radio network, took part in an anti-Israel and U.S. march in Oslo where picket signs with phrases like "USA and Israel: Axis of Evil" appeared. The Halvorsens and NRK were subjected to a vicious campaign launched by Zionists and the Israel Lobby in Norway.

Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre of the Labor Party has been criticized by the Israel Lobby and Zionists for comparing Israel's treatment of Palestinians to Nazi Germany's treatment of Jews. Støre has also called for the demolition of Israel's "Separation Wall" that runs through Palestinian territory on the West Bank, a stance that has earned him enmity and hatred from Israel's government and their Zionist allies in the West. Store paid a visit to Utoya before the massacre. The Foreign Minister was on the island as some of the Labor Party youth were participating in a "Boycott Israel" demonstration. The city of Trondheim was criticized by Israel for funding a trip to the UN in New York for Norwegian students to participate in a play called the "Gaza Monologues." Israel also blasted Norway for distributing a film called "Tears of Gaza."

After Israel offered assistance to Norway, including forensic and medical assistance, as well as the evacuation of the wounded from the 7/22 attack, Norway declined the offer.  The rejection of assistance from Israel indicates that the Norwegian government was suspicious of the offer from Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak. Other Israeli military teams in the West Bank have been accused of trafficking in human organs, an expose brought to light by the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet in August 2009. That same month, Israel's anti-Arab and anti-Muslim Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman accused Sweden and Norway of anti-Semitism, adding the outrageous charge that Norway was pro-Nazi, even though Norway's anti-Muslim and pro-Zionist activists were affiliated with neo-Nazi organizations. On December 11, 2010, a suspicious terrorist explosion took place in downtown Stockholm, injuring two people and blamed on a Swedish-Iraqi suicide bomber.  The bombing took place two weeks after the Swedish media reported that a Surveillance Detection Unit, operated form the U.S. embassy in Stockholm, was spying on Swedish citizens.

In the past few months, the Mossad has committed blatant acts of espionage and possible other terrorist attacks against nations it perceives as pro-Palestinian. During last year's devastating earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand, a team of Mossad agents was caught in the city. One of the agents died in the quake. The Mossad agents were found with multiple passports and thumb drives believed to have been used to download sensitive data from New Zealand government computer systems. New Zealand's Prime Minister John Key, who seemingly came from obscurity in New Zealand politics and whose Jewish mother immigrated from England, disregarded claims of Mossad espionage during the quake, even though he spoke to Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu four times on the day of the quake, after the dead Mossad agent was discovered by New Zealand police and intelligence.

New Zealand's Southland Times was criticized by New Zealand's Jewish community and Israel for promoting "conspiracy theories," the typical modus operandi for pro-Israeli Jews, known as sayanim and katsas, who are used by Israel abroad as propaganda and espionage agents. Ironically, Key was meeting with Obama at the White House as the bombing and shootings were occurring in Norway. Key was believed to have attended the homo-erotic annual meeting of a men-only fraternity composed of American and foreign political and business elitists at the secluded Bohemian Grove in northern California, a conclave that also saw the attendance of Israel's most notorious agent-of-influence in America, Henry Kissinger, who also serves as Obama's "special envoy" to the Russian leadership. Key's Labor Party predecessor, Helen Clark, was the subject of criticism in leaked 2004 State Department cables from the U.S. embassy in Wellington for cracking down on a Mossad team's acquisition of forged New Zealand passports. Once again, the cable leaks were courtesy of the suspect WikiLeaks operation.

One of the Mossad perpetrators, Zev William Barkan, who fled New Zealand to avoid arrest, had also been reported in the Cambodian capital of Phnom Penh, where he and other Israelis were producing pornographic and "snuff" movies, in which unsuspecting vagrants were murdered on camera.

In Egypt, Mossad agents have been accused by the present government of fomenting riots between Muslims and Coptic Christians. A recent explosion of seized Iranian weapons and ammunition being stored at a Cypriot naval base, a blast that killed the head of the Cypriot Navy, remains suspicious. The blast followed the decision of Cyprus's left-of-center government to recognize the sovereignty of Palestine. The resulting public outrage over the blast resulted in the resignation of pro-Palestinian Foreign Minister Markos Kyprianou and a major political embarrassment for Cyprus's president Dimitris Christofias, a member of the Communist AKEL party.

Mossad is a master at false-flag terrorist attacks designed to alter perceptions and punish opponents of Israeli policy. The fingerprints of Israeli intelligence are all over the 9/11 attacks on the United States, the 3/22 train bombings in Madrid, the 7/7 transit bombings in London, and, now, the 7/22 attacks in Norway... While the Israeli-influenced corporate media has droned on and on about the dangers of Islamist terrorism, it is now obvious that the major threat to public safety comes from the State of Israel, a rogue nation that does not hesitate to murder the innocent to achieve its sordid political aims.

[fornat]

Polícia conhecia Breivik antes de este ser detido[/b]

http://www.prisonplanet.com/police-knew-gunmans-name-before-arrest.html

Jon Snow, um conhecido apresentador de noticiários da Canal 4 britânico pergunta:

Como é que a polícia sabia o nome do assassino quando chegou à ilha ?

http://twitter.com/#!/jonsnowC4/status/95166969032085504

British news anchor questions how authorities were aware of Breivik's identity in advance

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, July 25, 2011

Police Knew Gunmans Name Before Arrest

Despite being portrayed by the media as inept due to the length of time it took them to reach the island of Utoeya, it has now emerged that police knew the name of gunman Anders Behring Breivik before they even arrested him, a startling admission that prompted one of Britain's top news anchors to question how authorities were aware of the gunman's identity in advance.

During his Channel 4 News broadcast on Friday evening, host Jon Snow asked "why police knew the killer's name by the time they had arrived on the island," reported the Telegraph live blog.

"He surrendered the moment police called his name 3 minutes after they arrived. What we don't know is how the police knew the terrorist's name before they arrested him," said Snow, who is recognized as one of Britain's most trusted news anchors, and cannot be dismissed as a "conspiracy theorist".

Snow also posed the question on his official Twitter page. http://twitter.com/#!/jonsnowC4/status/95166969032085504

How authorities knew the gunman's identity before his slaughter of young Norwegians on the island of Utoeya had even come to an end, and while the overwhelming speculation still centered around Islamic terrorists, is a mystery, as is the question of why the cops didn't shoot Breivik immediately.

It's also starkly inconsistent with the "incompetence" angle that's been heavily pushed by the establishment media in explaining why it took over 90 minutes for police to reach the island, a gap that significantly contributed to Breivik being able to claim such a huge number of victims.

Some have speculated that Breivik may have had accomplices, and although police disregarded eyewitness accounts of multiple shooters on the island, during testimony at his court case today, Breivik admitted that he was merely one part of an organization that included at least two other "cells" who were planning future attacks.

"I believe that there were two people who were shooting," survivor Alexander Stavdal told Norwegian VG, while other eyewitnesses reported hearing gunshots from "two different places on the island at the same time."

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show.

[camafeu]

EU Exploits Norway Massacre to Stifle Dissent

Wasting little time in exploiting the freshly dead bodies of dozens of Norwegian teenagers to push its draconian agenda, the European Union has swiftly announced that it plans to set up an "early warning system" to combat "extremism," the problem being that the EU treats legitimate criticism of its own corrupt institution as extremist.

"The European Commission is building a security system to issue early warnings on threats of extremism, xenophobia and other forms of radicalism, EC spokesman Michele Cercone said on Tuesday," reports RIA Novosti.

EU officials also met on Monday in a bid to "curb sales of firearms" to law-abiding citizens, despite the fact that it was Norway's policy on not allowing police instant access to firearms that contributed to the scale of last week's attack.

Eurosceptisim is on the rise across the contintent, which is why the neo-liberal elite are busy implying that people who oppose being ruled by an unelected, unaccountable, Soviet-style buearacratic tyranny are in league with Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik.

As an example, the fact that Breivik e-mailed the True Finns party hours before him rampage has somehow been offered as proof that the conservative True Finns bear some of the responsibility for the massacre. This would be like blaming John Lennon and Paul McCartney for the Manson family murders.

In reality, the EU's crass rush to exploit last week's tragedy has little to do with stopping the next Breivik and a lot to do with stifling criticism of its own institution.

The EU habitually uses the "extremist" label to discredit legitimate political opposition to its agenda, particularly when it wants to silence those who speak out against the EU's advocacy of mass immigration policies. In 2009, Dutch Freedom Party MP and prominent eurosceptic Geert Wilders was refused entry to Britain because his political opinions were deemed offensive under EU laws.

Read More:

» EU Exploits Norway Massacre to Stifle Dissent Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

[fornat]

http://octopedia.blogspot.com/

Terça-feira, 26 de Julho de 2011

Quem é que está realmente por trás do massacre de Oslo ?

Oficialmente, o massacre de Oslo terá sido cometido por uma única pessoa, particularmente fotogénica e que terá admitido todas as culpas.

Mas muitas dúvidas persistem. Será Anders Behring Breivik apenas um bode expiatório ? Estará alguma organização por trás destes acontecimentos ?

Este atentado parece ter a assinatura da Mossad israelita, pelo modus operandi, mas também pela punição infligida a um país que lhes tem feito frente. Além disso, existe a necessidade de vergar um país que tem estado à margem do sistema de globalização e a necessidade de uma viragem planeada do papão terrorista islâmico clássico com a criação do uma "Al-Qaida branca".

Muitas dúvidas...

Muitas questões e inconsistências permanecem neste massacre de Oslo. À primeira vista, a organização necessária à sua realização leva a crer que não seja fruto de um só homem, existe um número espantosamente elevado para um único atirador, aliás, algumas testemunhas referem a presença de outros atiradores na ilha.

Alguns peritos, ao observar os estragos produzidos pela explosão de Oslo, pensam que esta terá ocorrido no subsolo. Curiosamente, esta rua estava encerrada desde alguns dias por causa de trabalhos que se estariam a realizar no sistema de esgotos.

Sexta-feira era dia feriado na Noruega e os prédios governamentais estavam praticamente vazios, o que explica que só tenha havido 8 vítimas mortais. Porque é que uma pessoa que queria fazer um grande número de mortos terá escolhido este dia para fazer explodir edifícios vazios?

Uma curiosidade, que decididamente tem-se vindo a repetir em alguns cenários de grandes atentados, é o facto de que, dois dias antes, a polícia de Oslo ter feito um exercício anti-atentado no mesmo local. O mesmo se tinha passado nos atentados do 11 de setembro de 2001 em Nova Iorque e nos atentados de Londres em 7 de julho de 2005. Este modus operandi facilita uma série de desculpas no caso em que provas de cumplicidade estatais venham a surgir.

Por fim, o memorando de 1500 páginas redigidas ao longo de 9 anos pelo assassino, parece demasiado completo e complexo para ter sido feito por uma única pessoa. Por exemplo, os nomes referidos como potenciais alvos para Portugal estavam escritos num português perfeito, o que faz crer numa colaboração exterior e bem informada.  

  Relações tensas entre a Noruega e Israel.

- 18 de julho 2011. A Noruega considera legítima a candidatura da Palestina à ONU.

- junho 2011. A Noruega decide a retirada das suas tropas da Líbia, a partir do dia 1 de agosto, onde participava com a NATO.

- 29 março 2011. O governo norueguês anuncia que o celebre advogado judeu Dershowitz não é bem-vindo no país devido às suas posições polémicas a favor de Israel.

- 18 fevereiro 2011. A Noruega pede oficialmente que a embaixada de Israel deixe Oslo para se instalar na periferia por esta ter um impacto negativo sobre a qualidade de vida da população local, em particular por acharem as medidas de segurança excessivas.

- outubro 2010. A Noruega proíbe exercício militares de submarinos israelitas nas suas águas.

- agosto 2010. A Noruega rompe com os contratos que tinha com duas grandes empresas israelitas por as considerar moralmente condenáveis, sendo que uma delas, a Elbit Systems tinha participado na construção do muro de separação construído por Israel.

- A noruega está classificada como sendo um estado antisemita pelo lobby sionista.

A Al-Qaida Branca.

A questão que se põe é de saber se este massacre, foi perpetrado por um acto isolado de um psicopata, ou se terá sido organizado por uma qualquer organização secreta, e neste caso, quem beneficia com isso?

Primeiro convém recordar que a fase do terrorista islâmico está a ser cada vez mais posta em causa pela opinião pública. Muita gente já não acredita que todos os atentados perpetrado na última década seja fruto da famosa Al-Qaida. Passámos pois, para uma nova etapa com uma nova forma de terrorismo.

Agora, no meio de nós, europeus tranquilos, qualquer pessoa, por mais simpática que pareça, pode ser um potencial terrorista, temos pois, uma espécie de "Al-Qaida branca". O medo vai portanto continuar e novas medidas de luta antiterrorismo vão ser necessárias, com a consequente restrição das liberdades.

A Noruega não faz parte da União Europeia, tem tido um comportamento independente dos grandes lobbies financeiros, dado que tem largos excedentes proveniente da sua mais-valia petrolífera e além disso tem sido muito crítica em relação a Israel.

Todos estes factores não estão em consonância com a elite globalista mundial. A Noruega poderá ter sofrido assim um sério aviso para integrar os planos globais da minoria financeira que nos governa e onde os principais actores são de origem judaica.

http://www.alterinfo.net/Relations-Norvege-Israel_a61523.html?preaction=nl&id=9310505&idnl=94024&

http://www.alterinfo.net/La-police-d-Oslo-a-organise-des-journees-d-exercice-de-prevention-quelques-jours-avant-l-explosion-terroriste_a61543.html?preaction=nl&id=9310505&idnl=94024&

http://www.alterinfo.net/Terreur-a-Oslo-quel-agenda-cela-sert-il_a61541.html?preaction=nl&id=9310505&idnl=94024&;

[fornat]

"Como é que o perfil de Anders Breivik na sua página do Facebook no dia 22 de Julho não faz menção de ser cristão e conservador e no dia 23 de julho estas menções aparecem ? Dado que já estava preso, quem é que tinha poderes para fazer essa alteração ? "

http://octopedia.blogspot.com/

Quarta-feira, 27 de Julho de 2011

O estranho comportamento da polícia no massacre de Oslo

A polícia norueguesa dinamitou ontem as cargas explosivas que encontrou na fazenda do alegado autor do massacre de Oslo.

Um estranho comportamento, dado que estas poderiam servir de valiosas peças de convicção neste acontecimento. A polícia disse que os explosivos eram à base de nitrato de amónio e que as terá destruído para evitar um risco de explosão. Ora para que estas possam explodir é necessário juntar um componente, um combustível, dado que o nitrato de amónio é extremamente estável e necessita para explodir de uma temperatura elevada (mais de 200º) provocada por nitrometano ou TNT.

Por outro lado, parece difícil uma encomenda de 6 toneladas de adubo composto com nitrato de amónio não levantar suspeitas, sobretudo tratando-se de uma fazenda de cultura biológica.

Vários peritos em explosivo após analisarem as imagens da explosão de Oslo chegaram à conclusão que dificilmente esta terá tido origem no produto em causa, mas sim num explosivo muito mais potente, provavelmente de origem militar.

No dia 22 de julho, 600 jovens estavam reunidos no campo de verão do partido trabalhista na ilha de Utoya, quando às 17h Anders Breivik Behring vestido de polícia terá começado a disparar.

Vamos admitir que metade dos jovens tinham telemóvel e que um terço telefona a pedir socorro, ou seja 100 pessoas. Como é que a polícia diz ter recebido o primeiro telefonema apenas às 17h26?
As forças de segurança só chegam em frente da ilha às 18h por não teram encontrado um helicóptero disponível. Entretanto a canal de televisão NRK conseguiu alugar um helicóptero e filma as cenas do massacre.

Logo a seguir a polícia tem dificuldade em encontrar um barco disponível. Quando acaba por encontrar um barco, este tem uma avaria pouco tempo depois de iniciar a viagem.

À 18h25 a polícia chega finalmente à ilha. Dois minutos depois, Anders Breivik rende-se sem opor qualquer resistência.

No total, foram necessários 90 minutos para que as forças policiais pudessem intervir.

Como é que um único atirador conseguiu matar mais de 80 pessoas? Como as balas utilizadas foram balas de desfragmentação, que se pulverizam após o impacto, será impossível saber com que armas foram disparadas.

Poucas horas após este massacre somos inundados com informações detalhadas deste suspeito louro e de olhos azuis. Como é que o perfil de Anders Breivik na sua página do Facebook no dia 22 de julho não faz menção de ser cristão e conservador e no dia 23 de julho estas menções aparecem. Dado que já estava preso, quem é que tinha poderes para fazer essa alteração?

Primeira versão (22 julho 2011) da sua página do Facebook:

Segunda versão (23 julho 2011), publicada nos jornais, com dois novos centros de interesse "cristão" e conservador"

[fornat]

http://octopedia.blogspot.com/

Massacre de Oslo: a "Al-Qaida Branca"

Vamos cada vez mais assistir a atentados como de Oslo, realizados por extremistas de direita ou de esquerda ou fanáticos ocidentais, religiosos ou não. Desde o 11 de setembro de 2001, cada vez que um um atentado se produzia, era obra da Al-Qaida, estes eram os suspeitos do costume, a Al-Qaida funcionava como uma espécie de marca registada.

Estamos a assistir neste momento a uma viragem na manutenção do medo do terrorismo com a criação de uma "Al-Qaida Branca".

Actualmente, para ter impacto e falar de terrorismo, o visado tem de ser uma personalidade de envergadura mundial ou fazer um grande número de mortos como foi o caso deste massacre de Oslo. A frieza e o método deste norueguês impressionam e dão o sinal de um novo terrorismo.

O facto de terem sido massacrados europeus por europeus e não por uma pessoa de origem árabe foi criado para desestabilizar profundamente a nossa sociedade.

Existe uma inversão do movimento desta guerra do terror, o alvo já não é o muçulmano, mas sim nós próprios. Em vez de fazer mártires com a morte de muçulmanos, criam-se culpados implícitos: os nossos filhos.

Ao matar europeus, é como se o terrorista colocasse simbolicamente a arma nas mãos desses muçulmanos.

Esta nova atitude suscita a incompreensão no nosso cérebro e um tempo de latência em que o nosso raciocínio passa por um período de adaptação que poderá ser aproveitado para "aceitar" outros atentados deste tipo.

Este acto deixa-nos psicologicamente desarmados e fisicamente incapazes de prevenir crimes semelhantes. A partir de agora, o vizinho do lado poderá ser um potencial criminoso, dado que este tipo de atentado faz com que quem o pratique seja um criminoso invisível até ao momento do crime.

Apesar do método ter mudado, os culpados continuam a ser os mesmo, os muçulmanos. São eles no fim de contas, os verdadeiros responsáveis por deste mal-estar da nossa sociedade. O importante é ter um inimigo.

Este tipo de acto permite ilibar a nossa sociedade, dado que é praticado por uma única pessoa que assume a responsabilidade da sua actuação.

Esta nova forma de  terrorismo tenta também marginalizar as minorias. Passa a imagem de que todos os que não se revêem nos blocos centrais, políticos ou religiosos, são perigosos e potenciais assassinos. Ora, a grande maioria dos que pertencem a essas ditas minorias, mais não reivindicam que o direito à diferença.

Em outros termos, faz com que a sociedade desconfie de quem pensa de uma maneira diferente e obriga a que todos para serem aceites integrem a massa amorfa e acéfala da maioria.

Como exemplo mais flagrante, temos que em todas as democracias ocidentais existem sempre dois grandes partidos políticos, em Portugal o PS e o PSD, que se vão alternando no poder para nos dar a sensação que aquando do nosso voto, podemos escolher, quando na realidade são exactamente a mesma coisa.

Os que ocultamente  manipulam esses partidos, são os mesmos e, as leis eleitorais de todos esses países impedem que sejam substituídos por outros.

Esta nova forma de terrorismo foi também criada com esse fim: reunir o rebanho no "centro", desconfiar dos que estão à sua volta e claro, criar mecanismos para nos proteger, mesmo que seja à custa da perda das nossas liberdades.

Este acto deixa-nos psicologicamente desarmados e fisicamente incapazes de prevenir crimes semelhantes. A partir de agora, o vizinho do lado poderá ser um potencial criminoso, dado que este tipo de atentado faz com que quem o pratique seja um criminoso invisível até ao momento do crime.

Apesar do método ter mudado, os culpados continuam a ser os mesmo, os muçulmanos. São eles no fim de contas, os verdadeiros responsáveis por deste mal-estar da nossa sociedade. O importante é ter um inimigo.

Este tipo de acto permite ilibar a nossa sociedade, dado que é praticado por uma única pessoa que assume a responsabilidade da sua actuação.

Esta nova forma de  terrorismo tenta também marginalizar as minorias. Passa a imagem de que todos os que não se revêem nos blocos centrais, políticos ou religiosos, são perigosos e potenciais assassinos. Ora, a grande maioria dos que pertencem a essas ditas minorias, mais não reivindicam que o direito à diferença.

Em outros termos, faz com que a sociedade desconfie de quem pensa de uma maneira diferente e obriga a que todos para serem aceites integrem a massa amorfa e acéfala da maioria.

Como exemplo mais flagrante, temos que em todas as democracias ocidentais existem sempre dois grandes partidos políticos, em Portugal o PS e o PSD, que se vão alternando no poder para nos dar a sensação que aquando do nosso voto, podemos escolher, quando na realidade são exactamente a mesma coisa.

Os que ocultamente  manipulam esses partidos, são os mesmos e, as leis eleitorais de todos esses países impedem que sejam substituídos por outros.

Esta nova forma de terrorismo foi também criada com esse fim: reunir o rebanho no "centro", desconfiar dos que estão à sua volta e claro, criar mecanismos para nos proteger, mesmo que seja à custa da perda das nossas liberdades.

[fornat]

http://octopedia.blogspot.com/

Segunda-feira, 1 de Agosto de 2011

O inexplicável atraso da polícia no massacre de Oslo

Uma das questões centrais, que poderá explicar o que terá  realmente acontecido no massacre de Oslo, poderá estar em compreender a inexplicável demora das força de intervenção em chegar ao local. Os media oficiais não falam desse facto que, no entanto, parece ser fundamental.  


Forças especiais "amadoras".

Entre o início dos disparos de Anders Breivik, e  após as rocambolescas peripécias das forças de intervenção, a chegada à ilha demorou uma hora e meia. Que forças especiais são essas que estando apenas a 40 km do local do massacre demoram tanto tempo? Ainda para mais, convém não esquecer, que a Noruega pertencendo à NATO, tem os seus serviços secretos e as suas unidades especiais de intervenção a trabalhar em estreita colaboração com, entre outros, as experientes CIA e Mossad.

Quando antigos polícias noruegueses trabalham para os USA...

Em outubro do ano passado, a televisão norueguesa TV2 Nyhetskanalen revelava que a embaixada amricana em Oslo tinha contratado umas vinte pessoas para vigiar os noruegueses que viessem participar em manifestações hostis aos USA.  Essas pessoas foram recrutadas no meio de antigos polícias noruegueses reformados, a maioria de altas patentes. Portanto, temos que, desde 2000, antigos polícias noruegueses vigiavam os seus concidadãos ao serviço dos Estados Unidos.

Este tipos de unidades ao serviço da secreta americana, que também existem noutros países, tem o nome de Surveillance Detection Unit (SDU) e fazem parte do SIMAS (Security Incident Management Analysis System). As pessoas consideradas suspeitas são fotografadas e colocadas num ficheiro com os seus dados pessoais.

Nessa altura, após a emissão televisiva, o porta-voz da diplomacia norueguesa disse que o ministério dos Negócios Estrangeiros questionou o seu homologo americano, para saber se essa informação era verdadeira e em que consistia o programa. Interrogado pela TV2, o porta-voz do departamento de Estado americano, P.J. Crowley, afirmou que essas actividades tinham tido o acordo das autoridades norueguesas. O governo norueguês disse não ter conhecimento de acordo.

Estes agentes de espionagem, que trabalhavam para os Estados Unidos, sendo antigas altas-patentes da polícia norueguesa tinham toda a facilidade para infiltrar as actuais forças policiais e forças de intervenção. A inexplicável demora na intervenção da unidade especial de Oslo poderá ter aqui uma explicação. Todo o processo de socorro no massacre de Oslo poderá ter sido voluntariamente atrasada do interior, nas ordem de comando, na indisponibilidade de um helicoptero, na inexistencia de um barco e na curiosa avaria no primeiro barco, por alguns elementos dessas forças infiltradas.

Claro, que esta teoria  cruel é inaceitável para o nosso cérebro pela sua atrocidade, temos dificuldade em aceitar que tudo tenha partido do interior. Todavia, esta situação não seria inédita,  lembra o também inexplicável e inexplicado atraso na intervenção dos aviões de caças da força aérea americana quando dos atentados do 11 de setembro.

http://www.rtl.be/info/monde/international/750471/norvege-l-ambassade-americaine-accusee-d-avoir-surveille-des-centaines-de-gens

[fornat]

http://octopedia.blogspot.com/

Quarta-feira, 3 de Agosto de 2011

Massacre de Oslo: "Só mais uma coisa........... " (como diria o inspector Columbo)


Mais rápido que a polícia...

Como é que um homem, agindo só, pode ter planificado e organizado um atentado à bomba em Oslo, fazer uma viagem de carro e ir de barco até à ilha de Utoya em uma hora, segundo as fontes policiais, enquanto essas mesmas forças policiais demoraram uma hora e meia?

Um homem carregado...

Como é que um único homem, pesadamente armado, conseguiu disparar, sem parar, durante uma hora e meia? Uma única pessoa não poderia transportar uma tal carga de munições. Uma metralhadora, em que o peso de uma munição é de cerca de 8 g e com uma média de disparos de 500 tiros por minuto equivale a um peso de 4 kg de munições por minuto de tiro. Supondo que terá disparado 25% do tempo, isto equivale a 100 kg de munições.

O carro que se dilata...

Como é que um único carro terá tido tido a capacidade de transportar 6 toneladas de fertilizante? A massa volúmica do nitrato de amónio é de 850 a 1150 kg/m3. Seis toneladas equivalem a cerca de 7 metros cúbicos. Sendo que o carro em questão tem volume interior, mesmo sem os bancos de trás e da frente, de 2 metros cúbicos, seriam necessários pelo menos 3 ou 4 carros.