Chama-se Phoenix Interests Inc e está cotada a 0.0003 Usd.

Eu não tenho qualquer tipo de experiência nestes papéis mas fui alertado para esta menina por um amigo meu (tipo, põe meia dúzia de € nessa coisa e esquece).

Assim sendo, gostava de saber se alguém no fórum tem PXIT, quais as ideias sobre o seu futuro (que a evolução da cotação desaconselha ou antevê não ser risonho). Outro ponto negativo que tenho visto, é que os volumes, atendendo à cotação, são ridículos.

Por outro lado, o valor mínimo de uma acção são os 0.0001 pelo que não pode cair mais...(embora sejam 100% do capital potencialmente investido). Ou seja, há um factor de atracção que é aliciante e potenciador de ganhos extraordinários (pequenas fortunas com muito pouco investimento).

Obrigado.

Gpinto

Bom dia

Este post é só para ter pelo menos uma resposta 

Não sei nada da empresa, mas pelo gráfico parece-me que deve estar falida. A menos que saiba de algo que a possa levantar--take-over, patente  ou isso, não me parece de investir; o seu amigo não lhe adiantou mais pormenores.
A não ser que haja sinais de vida da cotação e volume, parece-me à priori um desperdício de capital; devem existir apostas mais promissoras, na àrea das pennies (que não são muito para o meu feitio).

Desconheço esta empresa, mas olhar para este gráfico de 3 anos até mete medo, é sempre a descer. Mais parece que a falência está à porta.

Haverá por ai muitas pennys com melhor aspecto, no entanto uns 100 ou 200 patacos podem vir a valer a valer uma fortuna, isto de pennys mais parece uma roleta.

Mas talvez o seu amigo tenha algum inside...

Fica o gráfico.

Grande GPinto,

Quanto tempo!! espero que estejas a voltar a estas lides cibernéticas e que este seja o primeiro de muitos posts.


Abraço,

  não, mas vê lá se gostas desta- GNTA - há 2 anos estava a 20$ ontem fez 0.35 centimos.



   Está assim com a eventualidade de um medicamento para a leucemia não ser aprovado pela fda. É que disso depende a sobrevivência da empresa segundo os analistas. Mas pese embora op mercado esteja a ditar a sua falâencia a decisão definitiva sái apenas em final de outubro.

   Mas no meio do panico um ou outro " doido" pode ter sorte.

   Alguns especialsitas do mergulho são erradamente chamados de scubawarriors. heheh


  abraço amigo e sejas bem aparecido!

De facto tenho andado arredado de fóruns e destas lides.

Tenho negociado quando posso, mas índices, fundamentalmente o nosso disciplinado NDX e o indomável DAX.

Mas dado que "cresci" dentro da Instituição que represento, o meu tempo, que já era muito limitado, evaporou-se e tempo é algo que procuro e "estou longo (comprador)....porque me falta"!

Agradeço as vossas palavras, Francis e Scuba e as respostas do Doc e Pekeno Buda. Por razões diferentes mas...

Francis, deixa-me desabafar. Acho que és um resistente e, mais do que isso, e desprezando o facto de te considerar um óptimo analísta, acho que tens conseguido manter o site animado e interessante. Tem sido uma tarefa titânica mas olha que nunca deixei de vir aqui a este cantinho visitar-vos. Folgo em saber que temos o Pedro (tanto que eu gosto das suas análises) a aparecer...de quando em vez...acho que faz muita falta...o "dream team".

Grande abraço a vós,

Gpinto

Eh lá! Tem lá calma GPinto, tarda nada estás a chamar-me de monstro como fizeram ao Pedro..


Obrigado pelas tuas palavras.
Como disse antes, espero que voltes com mais frequência e de preferência com as tuas análises. 

Um abraço,

Boas Gpinto,

Em relação à PXIT vou tentar fazer aqui neste post um research muito básico e tentar emitir uma opinião concreta sobre este papel.

Em primeiro lugar, o que faz a empresa ?

Profile: Phoenix Interests, Inc. provides online thoroughbred-listing services in Indiana. The company, through its subsidiary, Online Enterprises, Inc., operates two Web sites Barn66.com and BetBarn66.com that enable users to conduct live thoroughbred e-commerce and account wagering online. It offers account wagering services through affiliation with AmericaTab Ltd. The company, formerly known as Thoroughbred Interests, Inc., was founded in 1999 and changed its name to Phoenix Interests, Inc. in 2004. Phoenix is based in Jeffersonville, Indiana.
Website: http://www.phoenixinterests.com

Ok, explorando o site da empresa, a PXIT tem um site em que se publicam anúncios para compra e venda de cavalos: http://www.barn66.com/
O site parece interessante e até popular (embora não entenda nada de cavalos)... até aqui tudo bem.

Qual é o modelo de negócio da empresa ? como faz ela dinheiro ?

Tive alguma dificuldades em entender, mas parece-me que ganham qualquer coisa com os anúncios, ou com anúncios que pedem maior destaque dentro do site. Devem existir também alguns receitas marginais de publicidade dado que vi lá alguns banners.

Quanto dinheiro facturou a empresa ?

Ao analisar os últimos SEC fillings, nomeadamente o 10Q de Agosto, temos a resposta:  Facturou apenas $10.685 durante 2006

Quanto dinheiro gastou a empresa ?   

Resposta: em 2006 gastou $182.846

Dividas acumuladas da empresa ? existem ?
Resposta: Sim: $3.702.431

Como se tem financiado a empresa então ?

Resposta: emitindo novas acções sempre que necessário

No ano passado o board autorizou um aumento das «authorized shares» de 980.000.000 para 5.000.000.000, desde então continuaram com a diluição da empresa.

Quanto vale a empresa neste momento ?

Pergunta complicada...
Segundo o Yahoo Finance a Market Cap é de apenas $175.000, mas este valor está errado porque não se baseia no real numero de outstanding shares.
Embora tenha tido alguma dificuldade em encontrar este valor correcto, parece-me que o total de acções da empresa será por volta de 4,827,430,794 neste momento, o que se estiver correcto faz com que a empresa cotada nos $0.0003 tenha uma market cap de $1.448.229, cerca de 8 X mais do que «parece».

O que pensar aqui ?

O facto de uma acção estar no «chão», não quer obrigatoriamente dizer que se levante... com uma diluição exponencial das suas acções, o peso que está em cima da cotação neste momento é muito grande... Vejamos: se a empresa a $0.0003 vale quase 1.5M$.... se ela subir por exemplo para $0.0030 valeria 15M$....
Mas com $10.000 de receitas e custos operacionais 15X superiores a isso... é complicado....

Cenários potencialmente bons:
- Algumas empresas querem entrar em bolsa, e em vez de usarem os métodos normais de admissão, optam por comprar uma empresa cotada quase falida, usam-na como «shell» e entram assim em bolsa. A PXIT poderia ser um alvo desses e beneficiar assim de alguma apreciação.... Mas pessoalmente, com um passivo tão grande não vejo este cenário a acontecer aqui....

- A PXIT poderia ser alvo de especuladores, nomeadamente de uma qualquer técnica de «pump & dump» e mexer um bocado... pessoalmente, penso que os «pumpers» tem alvos mais fáceis com «floats» muito menores.

- A PXIT poderia realmente começar a facturar a sério e consolidar a sua situação financeira.... Pessoalmente, nem entendi direito o seu modelo de negócio....

Cenários Ainda Piores do que o actual:
- Acções como as da PXIT são um alvo fácil para outro tipo de especuladores.... Existe uma técnica usada por market makers com menos escruplos chamada «Cellar boxing», os alvos são normalmente empresas que estão perto do 0.0001/0.0002, com frágil situação financeira e diluição compulsiva.... A PXIT preenche estes 3 requisitos.
(é um bocado complicado explicar o «Cellar Boxing», deixo mais tarde um texto sobre isso)

Pessoalmente e olhando para um mercado com dezenas de milhares de papeis, não vejo para já qualquer interesse na PXIT. Posso estar a ver mal o filme, ou a minha análise não estar correcta, mas com tanta coisa por ai, nesta não me metia

Um abraço !

Ok para explicar o «Cellar Boxing» de que falei vai aqui um documento que tinha ai arquivado (para quem tiver pachorra de ler LOL):

*************************

Cellar Boxing:

Naked shorting into $0.0001, or, **Cellar Boxing**
There's a form of the securities fraud known as naked short selling that is becoming very popular and lucrative to the Market Makers that practice it. It is known as "Cellar boxing" and it has to do with the fact that the NASD and the SEC had to arbitrarily set a minimum level at which a stock can trade. This level was set at $.0001 or one-one hundredth of a penny. This level is appropriately referred to as "the cellar". This $.0001 level can be used as a "backstop" for all kinds of market maker and naked short selling manipulations.
"Cellar boxing" has been one of the security frauds du jour since 1999 when the market went to a "decimalization" basis. In the pre-decimalization days the minimum market spread for most stocks was set at 1/8th of a dollar and the market makers were guaranteed a healthy "spread". Since decimalization came into effect, those one-eighth of a dollar spreads now are often only a penny as you can see in Microsoft's quote throughout the day. Where did the unscrupulous MMs go to make up for all of this lost income? They headed "south" to the OTCBB and Pink Sheets where the protective effects from naked short selling like Rule 10-a, and NASD Rules 3350, 3360, and 3370 are nonexistent.
The unique aspect of needing an arbitrary "cellar" level is that the lowest possible incremental gain above this cellar level represents a 100% spread available to MMs making a market in these securities. When compared to the typical spread in Microsoft of perhaps four-tenths of 1%, this is pretty tempting territory. In fact, when the market is no bid to $.0001 offer there is theoretically an infinite spread.

In order to participate in "cellar boxing", the MMs first need to pummel the price per share down to these levels. The lower they can force the share price, the larger are the percentage spreads to feed off of. This is easily done via garden variety naked short selling. In fact if the MM is large enough and has enough visibility of buy and sell orders as well as order flow, he can simultaneously be acting as the conduit for the sale of nonexistent shares through Canadian co-conspiring broker/dealers and their associates with his right hand at the same time that his left hand is naked short selling into every buy order that appears through its own proprietary accounts. The key here is to be a dominant enough of a MM to have visibility of these buy orders. This is referred to as "broker/dealer internalization" or naked short selling via "desking" which refers to the market makers trading desk. While the right hand is busy flooding the victim company's market with "counterfeit" shares that can be sold at any instant in time the left hand is nullifying any upward pressure in share price by neutralizing the demand for the securities. The net effect becomes no demonstrable demand for shares and a huge oversupply of shares which induces a downward spiral in share price.

In fact, until the "beefed up" version of Rule 3370 (Affirmative determination in writing of "borrowability" by settlement date) becomes effective, U.S. MMs have been "legally" processing naked short sale orders out of Canada and other offshore locations even though they and the clearing firms involved knew by history that these shares were in no way going to be delivered. The question that then begs to be asked is how "the system" can allow these obviously bogus sell orders to clear and settle. To find the answer to this one need look no further than to Addendum "C" to the Rules and Regulations of the NSCC subdivision of the DTCC. This gaping loophole allows the DTCC, which is basically the 11,000 b/ds and banks that we refer to as "Wall Street", to borrow shares from those investors naive enough to hold these shares in "street name" at their brokerage firm. This amounts to about 95% of us. Theoretically, this "borrow" was designed to allow trades to clear and settle that involved LEGITIMATE 1 OR 2 DAY delays in delivery. This "borrow" is done unbeknownst to the investor that purchased the shares in question and amounts to probably the largest "conflict of interest" known to mankind. The question becomes would these investors knowingly loan, without compensation, their shares to those whose intent is to bankrupt their investment if they knew that the loan process was the key mechanism needed for the naked short sellers to effect their goal? Another question that arises is should the investor's b/d who just earned a commission and therefore owes its client a fiduciary duty of care, be acting as the intermediary in this loan process keeping in mind that this b/d is being paid the cash value of the shares being loaned as a means of collateralizing the loan, all unbeknownst to his client the purchaser.
An interesting phenomenon occurs at these "cellar" levels. Since NASD Rule 3370 allows MMs to legally naked short sell into markets characterized by a plethora of buy orders at a time when few sell orders are in existence, a MM can theoretically "legally" sit at the $.0001 level and sell nonexistent shares all day long because at no bid and $.0001 ask there is obviously a huge disparity between buy orders and sell orders. What tends to happen is that every time the share price tries to get off of the cellar floor and onto the first step of the stairway at $.0001 there is somebody there to step on the hands of the victim corporation's market.

Once a given micro cap corporation is "boxed in the cellar" it doesn't have a whole lot of options to climb its way out of the cellar. One obvious option would be for it to reverse split its way out of the cellar but history has shown that these are counter-productive as the market capitalization typically gets hammered and the post split share price level starts heading back to its original pre-split level.

Another option would be to organize a sustained buying effort and muscle your way out of the cellar but typically there will, as if by magic, be a naked short sell order there to meet each and every buy order. Sometimes the shareholder base can muster up enough buying pressure to put the market at $.0001 bid and $.0002 offer for a limited amount of time. Later the market makers will typically pound the $.0001 bids with a blitzkrieg of selling to wipe out all of the bids and the market goes back to no bid and $.0001 offer. When the weak-kneed shareholders see this a few times they usually make up their mind to sell their shares the next time that a $.0001 bid appears and to get the heck out of Dodge. This phenomenon is referred to as "shaking the tree" for weak-kneed investors and it is very effective.

At times the market will go to $.0001 bid and $.0003 offer. This sets up a juicy 200% spread for the MMs and tends to dissuade any buyers from reaching up to the "lofty" level of $.0003. If a $.0002 bid should appear from a MM not "playing ball" with the unscrupulous MMs, it will be hit so quickly that Level 2 will never reveal the existence of the bid. The $.0001 bid at $.0003 offer market sets up a "stalemate" wherein market makers can leisurely enjoy the huge spreads while the victim company slowly dilutes itself to death by paying the monthly bills with "real" shares sold at incredibly low levels. Since all of these development-stage corporations have to pay their monthly bills, time becomes on the side of the naked short sellers.

At times it almost seems that the unscrupulous market makers are not actively trying to kill the victim corporation but instead want to milk the situation for as long of a period of time as possible and let the corporation die a slow death by dilution. The reality is that it is extremely easy to strip away 99% of a victim company's share price or market cap and to keep the victim corporation "boxed" in the cellar, but it really is difficult to kill a corporation especially after management and the shareholder base have figured out the game that is being played at their expense.

As the weeks and months go by the market makers make a fortune with these huge percentage spreads but the net aggregate naked short positions become astronomical from all of this activity. This leads to some apprehension amongst the co-conspiring MMs. The predicament they find themselves in is that they can't even stop naked short selling into every buy order that appears because if they do the share price will gap and this will put tremendous pressures on net capital reserves for the MMs and margin maintenance requirements for the co-conspiring hedge funds and others operating out of the more than 13,000 naked short selling margin accounts set up in Canada. And of course covering the naked short position is out of the question since they can't even stop the day-to-day naked short selling in the first place and you can't be covering at the same time you continue to naked short sell.

What typically happens in these situations is that the victim company has to massively dilute its share structure from the constant paying of the monthly burn rate with money received from the selling of "real" shares at artificially low levels. Then the goal of the naked short sellers is to point out to the investors, usually via paid "Internet bashers", that with the, let's say, 50 billion shares currently issued and outstanding, that this lousy company is not worth the $5 million market cap it is trading at, especially if it is just a shell company whose primary business plan was wiped out by the naked short sellers' tortuous interference earlier on.

The truth of the matter is that the single biggest asset of these victim companies often becomes the astronomically large aggregate naked short position that has accumulated throughout the initial "bear raid" and also during the "cellar boxing" phase. The goal of the victim company now becomes to avoid the 3 main goals of the naked short sellers, namely: bankruptcy, a reverse split, or the forced signing of a death spiral convertible debenture out of desperation. As long as the victim company can continue to pay the monthly burn rate, then the game plan becomes to make some of the strategic moves that hundreds of victim companies have been forced into doing which includes name changes, CUSIP # changes, cancel/reissue procedures, dividend distributions, amending of by-laws and Articles of Corporation, etc. Nevada domiciled companies usually cancel all of their shares in the system, both real and fake, and force shareholders and their b/ds to PROVE the ownership of the old "real" shares before they get a new "real" share. Many also file their civil suits at this time also. This indirect forcing of hundreds of U.S. micro cap corporations to go through all of these extraneous hoops and hurdles as a means to survive, whether it be due to regulatory apathy or lack of resources, is probably one of the biggest black eyes the U.S. financial systems have ever sustained. In a perfect world it would be the regulators that periodically audit the "C" and "D" sub-accounts at the DTCC, the proprietary accounts of the MMs, clearing firms, and Canadian b/ds, and force the buy-in of counterfeit shares, many of which are hiding behind altered CUSIP #s, that are detected above the Rule 11830 guidelines for allowable "failed deliveries" of one half of 1% of the shares issued. U.S. micro cap corporations should not have to periodically "purge" their share structure of counterfeit electronic book entries but if the regulators will not do it then management has a fiduciary duty to do it.

um abraço e obrigado,

Gpinto

Citação de: Gpinto em Setembro 08, 2006, 20:11
um abraço e obrigado,

Gpinto

De nada Gpinto,

Sorry não ter nada de bom a dizer sobre a PXIT, mas só depois de meter mãos à obra é que dava para tirar conclusões.

Da minha parte desejo-te boa sorte com ela, espero que exista ai alguma «carta na manga», ou que a minha abordagem esteja de alguma forma errada

um abraço !