Clubeinvest.com — Arquivo Histórico (1997-2011)
Esta é uma cápsula do tempo da comunidade financeira portuguesa. Login activo para membros.
Clubeinvest.com
Home Privado Fórum Acções Índices Metastock Portfolio Managers Publicações Blogs Contacto
 

Editar as notícias:

As mensagens escritas no Phorum (1997-2002) estão guardadas aqui: /phorum3/

Menu principal

How Wall Street Lied to Its Computers

Iniciado por bluexip, Outubro 11, 2008, 18:36

Tópico anterior - Tópico seguinte

bluexip

So where were the quants?

(Credit: Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times)

That's what has been running through my head as I watch some of the oldest and seemingly best-run firms on Wall Street implode because of what turned out to be really bad bets on mortgage securities.

Before I started covering the Internet in 1997, I spent 13 years covering trading and finance. I covered my share of trading disasters from junk bonds, mortgage securities and the financial blank canvas known as derivatives. And I got to know bunch of quantitative analysts ("quants"): mathematicians, computer scientists and economists who were working on Wall Street to develop the art and science of risk management.

They were developing systems that would comb through all of a firm's positions, analyze everything that might go wrong and estimate how much it might lose on a really bad day.

We've had some bad days lately, and it turns out Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and maybe some others bet far too much. Their quants didn't save them.

I called some old timers in the risk-management world to see what went wrong.

(...)

in http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/18/how-wall-streets-quants-lied-to-their-computers/?pagemode=print
Ever wonder why fund managers can't beat the S&P 500? 'Cause they're sheep, and sheep get slaughtered.
- Gordon Gekko in Wall Street